Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-38108

CLOUD COUNTRY WEST UNITS

TWO AND THREE PROPERTY

OWNERS ASSOCIATION,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

CHUCK HARDGRAVE AND

MELISSA HARDGRAVE, husband

and wife,

Defendants-Appellants.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF OTERO COUNTY
Angie K. Schneider, District Judge

Courvoisier Law, LLC

Rebekah A. Scott Courvoisier

Alamagordo, NM

for Appellee

Richard A. Hawthorne

Ruidoso, NM

for Appellants

MEMORANDUM OPINION

VARGAS, Judge.

{1}       We issued a notice of proposed summary disposition in this matter proposing to affirm the district court. Appellee has filed a memorandum in support of our proposed summary disposition, and Appellant has not filed a memorandum in opposition.

CONCLUSION

{2}       Accordingly, for the reasons set out in our notice of proposed summary disposition, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (“Failure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice.”).

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

JULIE J. VARGAS, Judge

WE CONCUR:

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.