Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Frick v. Veazey - cited by 97 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-39139

GRETCHEN WELCH,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

ABQ ROOF SYSTEMS, LLC,

Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SANDOVAL COUNTY
James A. Noel, District Judge

Bauman & Dow, P.C.

Christopher P. Bauman

Cynthia L. Weisman

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

Calvert Menicucci, P.C.

Sean R. Calvert

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1}       Defendant ABQ Roof Systems is appealing from a district court order denying its motion to compel arbitration. We issued a calendar notice on October 15, 2020, proposing to affirm. Plaintiff has responded with a memorandum in support. Defendant has not filed a memorandum in opposition, and the time for doing so has expired. See Rule 12-210(D)(2) NMRA. Accordingly, we affirm the district court. See Frick v. Veazey, 1993-NMCA-119, ¶ 2, 116 N.M. 246, 861 P.2d 287 (stating that “[f]ailure to file a memorandum in opposition constitutes acceptance of the disposition proposed in the calendar notice”).

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.