Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-37866

AIMEE HITTINGER, as Personal

Representative of the Estate of

Mark Owens Burrows,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

ESSENCE OF LIGHT, INC., d/b/a

TIERRA DE SUENO, INC., d/b/a

LA PALOMA HOT SPRINGS & SPA;

MELEASA MALZAHN; and DANIEL

WILKERSON,

Defendants-Appellees.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SIERRA COUNTY
Mercedes C. Murphy, District Judge

Sandoval Firm

Richard A. Sandoval

Santa Fe, NM

Collins & Collins, P.C.

Parrish Collins

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

Guebert Gentile & Piazza PC

Lawrence A. Junker

Albuquerque, NM

Lewis, Brisbois, Bisgaard & Smith LLP

Gregory L. Biehler

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellee

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1}       Plaintiff appeals from the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendants and denial of Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration. This Court issued a calendar notice proposing to affirm the district court’s order on December 21, 2020. On January 6, 2021, Defendants filed a memorandum in support of this Court’s notice of proposed disposition. On January 7, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion for an extension of time to file a memorandum in opposition, which this Court granted, extending Plaintiff’s time to file such a memorandum until February 22, 2021. As of this date, Plaintiff has not filed a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s notice of proposed disposition, and the extended time for doing so has now run. Accordingly, we rely on the reasoning set out in this Court’s notice of proposed disposition and we affirm.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

ZACHARY A. IVES, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.