Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-39217

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

JOSHUA LOYD,

Defendant-Appellant.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CURRY COUNTY
Matthew E. Chandler, District Judge

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

Laurie K. Blevins, Assistant Attorney General

Santa Fe, NM

for Appellee

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

Mary Barket, Assistant Appellate Defender

Santa Fe, NM

for Appellant

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANISEE, Chief Judge.

{1}       Defendant appeals from his possession of a controlled substance conviction set forth in the district court’s judgment and sentence. This Court entered a notice of proposed disposition, proposing to summarily affirm. Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition and motion to amend the docketing statement. We then entered a second notice of proposed disposition, proposing to summarily reverse Defendant’s conviction and order a new trial. Subsequently, the State filed with this Court a notice that it will not be filing a memorandum in opposition to this Court’s second notice of proposed disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our second notice of proposed disposition and herein, we reverse the district court’s judgment and sentence, vacate Defendant’s conviction of possession of a controlled substance, and remand to the district court for a new trial.

{2}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

J. MILES HANISEE, Chief Judge

WE CONCUR:

KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge

JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.