Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Hennessy v. Duryea - cited by 657 documents
State v. Johnson - cited by 172 documents
Decision Content
This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
No. A-1-CA-39682
BARBARA B. SHARP,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v.
LYNN S. SHARP,
Respondent-Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Jane C. Levy, District Judge
Walther Family Law PC
Gretchen Mary Walther
Santa Fe, NM
for Appellee
Michael Danoff
Albuquerque, NM
for Appellant
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BOGARDUS, Judge.
{1} Respondent appeals seeking reversal of the district court’s order of attorney fees. [CN 1] In our notice of proposed disposition, we proposed to summarily affirm the district court. [CN 3] Petitioner filed a memorandum in support, which agreed with our proposed affirmance. Respondent, however, failed to file a memorandum in opposition to our proposed disposition. Accordingly, for the reasons stated herein and in our notice of proposed disposition, we affirm. See Hennessy v. Duryea, 1998-NMCA-036, ¶ 24, 124 N.M. 754, 955 P.2d 683 (“Our courts have repeatedly held that, in summary calendar cases, the burden is on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or law.”); State v. Johnson, 1988-NMCA-029, ¶ 8, 107 N.M. 356, 758 P.2d 306 (explaining that when a case is decided on the summary calendar, an issue is deemed abandoned when a party fails to respond to the proposed disposition of that issue).
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
KRISTINA BOGARDUS, Judge
WE CONCUR:
JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge
JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge