Court of Appeals of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,410 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the New Mexico Court of Appeals was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Court of Appeals.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

No. A-1-CA-39954

STATE OF NEW MEXICO ex rel.,

CHILDREN, YOUTH & FAMILIES

DEPARTMENT,

Petitioner-Appellee,

v.

JENNIFER K.,

Respondent-Appellant,

IN THE MATTER OF ALEXIS K.,

Child.

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY
Alma C. Roberson, District Judge

Mary McQueeney, Chief Children’s Court Attorney

Robert Retherford, Children’s Court Attorney

Santa Fe, NM

for Appellee

The Law Office of Nancy L. Simmons, P.C.

Nancy L. Simmons

Albuquerque, NM

for Appellant

New Mexico Family Law PC

Amanda Ann Aragon

Albuquerque, NM

Guardian Ad Litem

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ATTREP, Judge.

{1}       Mother appeals the termination of her parental rights to a minor child. This Court assigned this appeal to our general calendar, instructing the parties to brief an issue involving potential ineffective assistance of counsel. In its answer brief, the Children Youth & Families Department (the Department) conceded that Mother was denied due process and asked that this Court reverse the judgment entered below and remand for the purpose of conducting a new trial, thereby mooting the remaining issues raised in this appeal. The parties have since filed a joint motion asking that this matter be remanded for a new trial. Having reviewed the parties’ briefing and the record on appeal, we agree that the due process violation conceded by the Department requires reversal and moots the remaining issues raised on appeal. As a result, we conclude that the parties’ joint motion should be granted.

{2}       Accordingly, the judgment entered below is reversed, and this matter is remanded for a new trial.

{3}       IT IS SO ORDERED.

JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge

WE CONCUR:

JACQUELINE R. MEDINA, Judge

JANE B. YOHALEM, Judge

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.