Supreme Court of New Mexico

Decision Information

Decision Content

CLARK V. FULGHAM, 1944-NMSC-041, 48 N.M. 353, 151 P.2d 56 (S. Ct. 1944)

CLARK
vs.
FULGHAM

No. 4828

SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

1944-NMSC-041, 48 N.M. 353, 151 P.2d 56

August 18, 1944

Appeal from District Court, Curry County; J. C. Compton, Judge.

Replevin by Joe Clark against Earl Fulgham to recover possession of a trailer. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

COUNSEL

Walter W. Mayes and Richard F. Rowley, both of Clovis, for appellant.

Otto Smith, of Clovis, for appellee.

JUDGES

Brice, Justice. Sadler, C. J., and Mabry, Bickley, and Threet, JJ., concur.

AUTHOR: BRICE

OPINION

{*353} {1} The appellee brought this replevin action to recover possession of a trailer from appellant.

{*354} {2} The only question is whether there is substantial evidence in the record to support the court's finding that the appellee was the owner and entitled to the possession of the trailer in question.

{3} We have reviewed the evidence in considering this claim of error and do not find the evidence unsubstantial.

{4} The judgment of the district court is affirmed, and it is so ordered.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.