Supreme Court of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad - cited by 123 documents

Decision Content

EDDIE'S INFERNO, INC. V. CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, 1968-NMSC-155, 79 N.M. 512, 445 P.2d 389 (S. Ct. 1968)

EDDIE'S INFERNO, INC., a New Mexico corporation, d/b/a
Eddie's Inferno, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees and
Cross-Appellants,
vs.
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE, State of New Mexico, a municipal
corporation, Defendant-Appellant and Cross-Appellee

No. 8624

SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

1968-NMSC-155, 79 N.M. 512, 445 P.2d 389

September 23, 1968

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY, TACKETT, Judge

COUNSEL

Frank M. Mims, Albuquerque, for appellant.

Montoya & Montoya, Joseph B. Zucht, Albuquerque, for appellees.

JUDGES

Carmody, Justice. Noble and Moise, JJ., concur.

AUTHOR: CARMODY

OPINION

{*513} OPINION

{1} The issue in this case is identical with that decided in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, 79 N.M. 260, 442 P.2d 572 (1968). To lay at rest appellees' paralogistic argument, we reaffirm what is implicit in Sunset Package Store, Inc. v. City of Carlsbad, supra, that § 46-4-2, N.M.S.A.1953, does not require the adoption of a new ordinance each year in order to impose a valid license tax.

{2} The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with instruction to the trial court to dissolve its injunction and to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.

{3} The cross-appeal, being dependent upon the affirmance of the trial court's judgment, fails.

{4} It is so ordered.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.