Supreme Court of New Mexico
Decision Information
Institute for Essential Hous., Inc. v. Keith - cited by 98 documents
Decision Content
INSTITUTE FOR ESSENTIAL HOUS., INC. V. MCKNIGHT, 1966-NMSC-068, 76 N.M. 498, 416 P.2d 379 (S. Ct. 1966)
INSTITUTE FOR ESSENTIAL HOUSING, INC., a
New Jersey
Corporation, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff and Appellant,
vs.
LAWRENCE E. McKNIGHT, Defendant-Cross-Defendant and
Appellee
No. 7758
SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO
1966-NMSC-068, 76 N.M. 498, 416 P.2d 379
April 11, 1966
Appeal from the District Court of Lincoln County, Zimmerman, Judge
Motion for Rehearing Denied July 25, 1966
COUNSEL
BOYCE & FETTINGER, Alamogordo, New Mexico, Attorneys for Appellant.
FRAZIER, CUSACK & SCHNEDAR, Roswell, New Mexico, Attorneys for Appellee.
JUDGES
NOBLE, Justice, wrote the opinion.
WE CONCUR:
DAVID W. CARMODY, C.J., DAVID CHAVEZ, JR., J.
OPINION
NOBLE, Justice.
{1} Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. has appealed from a summary judgment dismissing its cross-complaint against Lawrence E. McKnight. The facts are identical with those in Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. Keith, 76 N.M. 492, 416 P.2d 157, in which an opinion was filed this day. Upon authority of that decision, this case must be reversed, summary judgment vacated and the trial court directed to proceed further in a manner not inconsistent with the opinion in Institute for Essential Housing, Inc. v. Keith.
{2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
WE CONCUR:
DAVID W. CARMODY, C.J., DAVID CHAVEZ, JR., J.
MOTION FOR REHEARING
PER CURIAM.
The motion for rehearing is denied. The following is in addition to the opinion heretofore filed.
OPINION ON REHEARING
NOBLE, Justice.
{3} The question of whether any acts prohibited by the statute affect the consideration or validity of the obligation sued upon is not before us on this appeal, and we express no opinion thereon.
WE CONCUR:
DAVID W. CARMODY, C.J., DAVID CHAVEZ, JR., J.