Supreme Court of New Mexico

Decision Information

Decision Content

PROCTER V. FEZ CLUB, 1966-NMSC-083, 76 N.M. 241, 414 P.2d 219 (S. Ct. 1966)

RAY PROCTER and PAULINE PROCTER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
vs.
FEZ CLUB, a corporation, Defendant-Appellee

No. 7845

SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

1966-NMSC-083, 76 N.M. 241, 414 P.2d 219

May 09, 1966

Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Macpherson, Jr., Judge

COUNSEL

McATEE, TOULOUSE, MARCHIONDO, RUUD & GALLAGHER, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for Appellants.

MODRALL, SEYMOUR, SPERLING, ROEHL & HARRIS, Albuquerque, New Mexico, Attorneys for Appellee.

JUDGES

WOOD, Judge, wrote the opinion.

WE CONCUR:

DAVID W. CARMODY, C.J., J. C. COMPTON, J.

AUTHOR: WOOD

OPINION

WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.

{1} This appeal involves a dismissal under Rule 41(e) (§ 21-1-1(41)(e), N.M.S.A. 1953). The complaint was filed July 20, 1962. The answer was filed August 15, 1962. Plaintiff filed a motion for immediate trial setting on November 13, 1963. Defendant's motion to dismiss was filed September 1, 1964. The order dismissing under Rule 41(e) was filed December 21, 1964.

{2} Plaintiffs' motion to set the case for trial, made prior to defendant's motion to dismiss, prevents a dismissal under Rule 41(e). Martin v. Leonard Motor-El Paso, 75 N.M. 219, 402 P.2d 954; Foster v. Schwartzman, 75 N.M. 632, 409 P.2d 267; Kennedy v. Nelson, 76 N.M. 299, 414 P.2d 518, decided March 21, 1966.

{3} The order of the trial court is reversed. The case is remanded with instructions to reinstate the complaint and to place the cause on the trial docket.

{4} IT IS SO ORDERED.

WE CONCUR:

DAVID W. CARMODY, C.J., J. C. COMPTON, J.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.