Supreme Court of New Mexico

Decision Information

State Bank of Commerce v. Speidel

Collection Supreme Court of New Mexico
Date 12/03/1921
Official Citation 1921-NMSC-106
NM Report Citation 27 N.M. 511
Parallel Citations 202 P. 1118
Docket Numbers 2582
Decision-maker(s) STEPHEN B. DAVIS, JR.; HERBERT F. RAYNOLDS; FRANK W. PARKER
Opinion Type Reported Opinions
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
Manby v. Voorhees - cited by 66 documents
Morrison v. Crisp - cited by 3 documents

Decision Content

STATE BANK OF COMMERCE V. SPEIDEL, 1921-NMSC-106, 27 N.M. 511, 202 P. 1118 (S. Ct. 1921)

STATE BANK OF COMMERCE
vs.
SPEIDEL

No. 2582

SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

1921-NMSC-106, 27 N.M. 511, 202 P. 1118

December 03, 1921

Appeal from District Court, Union County; Lieb, Judge. Action by the State Bank of Commerce against Jacob Speidel. Judgment in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

SYLLABUS

SYLLABUS BY THE COURT

COUNSEL

Thos. F. Savage, of Clayton, for appellant.

Hugh B. Woodward, of Clayton, for appellee.

JUDGES

Davis, J. Raynolds, C. J., and Parker, J., concur.

AUTHOR: DAVIS

OPINION

OPINION OF THE COURT.

{1} The material facts in this case are identical with those in Morrison v. Crisp, 27 N.M. 380, 202 P. 123, decided at the present term. The same defense of lack of consideration was pleaded to the note sued upon, and the same law applies. That decision governs this case. The judgment is therefore affirmed; and it is so ordered.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.