Supreme Court of New Mexico

Decision Information

Decision Content

THOMPSON V. HENRY SINGLETON GROUP, 128 N.M. 150, 990 P.2d 824 (S. Ct. 1999)

BRIAN THOMPSON, Worker-Petitioner,
vs.
THE HENRY SINGLETON GROUP d/b/a CONCHAS RANCH, INC., and
CIGNA INSURANCE COMPANY,
Employer-Insurer-Respondents.
Defendant-Respondent.

NO. 25,885

SUPREME COURT OF NEW MEXICO

128 N.M. 150, 990 P.2d 824

September 02, 1999, Decided

JUDGES

Hon. Pamela B. Minzner, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico.

AUTHOR: PAMELA B. MINZNER

OPINION

ORDER

WHEREAS, this matter came on for consideration by the Court upon a petition for writ of certiorari, and the Court having considered said petition and being sufficiently advised Chief Justice Pamela B. Minzner, Senior Justice Joseph F. Baca, Justice Gene E. Franchini, Justice Patricio M. Serna, and Justice Petra Jimenez Maes concurring;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the petition hereby is GRANTED and a writ of certiorari shall issue to the New Mexico Court of Appeals;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is GRANTED on all issues presented in the petition;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner shall file his brief in chief on or before October 21, 1999, with respondents' answer brief due forty-five (45) days after the filing of petitioner's brief, and petitioner's reply brief, if any, due twenty (20) days after filing of respondents' answer brief in accordance with the Rules of Appellate Procedure;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the briefs shall consolidate and update the briefs filed in the New Mexico Court of Appeals with respect to the issues identified herein, without incorporation by reference, and shall comment on the Court of Appeals memorandum opinion filed July 20, 1999; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that oral argument shall be heard after the filing of all briefs.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WITNESS, The Hon. Pamela B. Minzner, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the State of New Mexico, and the seal of said Court this 2nd day of September, 1999.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.