Supreme Court of New Mexico

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Laws and Court Rules
Chapter 66 - Motor Vehicles - cited by 2,897 documents
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,258 documents
Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
State v. Adams - cited by 19 documents
State v. Adams - cited by 17 documents

Decision Content

This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.  Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions.  Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

Filing Date: May 26, 2022

No. S-1-SC-37774

STATE OF NEW MEXICO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

JAMES HARRISON,

Defendant-Petitioner.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
Karen L. Townsend, District Judge

Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender

Caitlin C.M. Smith, Assistant Appellate Defender

Santa Fe, NM

for Petitioner

Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General

John Kloss, Assistant Attorney General

Santa Fe, NM

for Respondent

DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

VIGIL, Chief Justice.

{1}         WHEREAS, the Court granted Defendant James Harrison’s petition for writ of certiorari to review the Court of Appeals determination that the district court erred in ruling that the blood test results at issue were inadmissible because the district court misapprehended State v. Adams, 2019-NMCA-043, 447 P.3d 1142 and NMSA 1978, Section 66-8-103 (1978); and

{2}         WHEREAS, the Court ordered that this case be held in abeyance pending the Court’s disposition of State v. Adams, 2022-NMSC-008, 503 P.3d 1130; and

{3}         WHEREAS, this Court issued an opinion in Adams, id.; and

{4}         WHEREAS, the Court concludes that the issue of law presented in this case was addressed by the Court’s opinion in Adams, id.; and

{5}         WHEREAS, the Court exercises its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1) NMRA to dispose of this case by nonprecedential order rather than a formal opinion;

{6}         NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the memorandum opinion of the Court of Appeals is affirmed, and the matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Adams, 2022-NMSC-008.

{7}         IT IS SO ORDERED.

MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Justice

C. SHANNON BACON, Justice

DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice

JULIE J. VARGAS, Justice

BRIANA H. ZAMORA, Justice, not participating

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.