This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- The case involves a dispute between the Petitioner-Appellee (Mother) and the Respondent-Appellant (Father) over the modification of child support for their one child.
Procedural History
- District Court of Sandoval County, Allen R. Smith, District Judge: Denied Father's motion to modify child support.
Parties' Submissions
- Respondent-Appellant (Father): [Not applicable or not found]
- Petitioner-Appellee (Mother): [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the district court's order denying the motion to modify child support should be affirmed.
Disposition
- The district court's order denying the motion to modify child support is affirmed.
Reasons
-
The decision was made by a panel consisting of Judges Julie J. Vargas, Jacqueline R. Medina, and Megan P. Duffy. The Court issued a notice of proposed disposition, suggesting a summary affirmation of the district court's decision. The Father indicated he did not intend to oppose this summary disposition. Consequently, based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition, the Court affirmed the district court's order denying the motion to modify child support (para 1).
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.