AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

McAninch v. Bruckner (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 04/14/2016
Docket Numbers 35,129
Relations See full-text opinion - McAninch v. Bruckner - 04/14/2016 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Carl J. Butkus, District Judge: Summary dismissal proposed for reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellants: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed (para 2).

Reasons

  • Jonathan B. Sutin, Judge, with James J. Wechsler, Judge, and Timothy L. Garcia, Judge concurring, decided to dismiss the appeal. The decision was based on the lack of opposition to the proposed summary dismissal, as no memorandum opposing the summary dismissal was filed within the allotted time frame (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.