This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- The case involves the Defendant-Appellant, David Elliott Castle, who appealed from the district court's denial of his motion to dismiss based on claims of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy.
Procedural History
- [Not applicable or not found]
Parties' Submissions
- Appellant: Argued for the dismissal of the case on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy.
- Appellee: The specific arguments of the Appellee (State of New Mexico) are not detailed in the provided text.
Legal Issues
- Whether the district court erred in denying the Defendant-Appellant's motion to dismiss on the grounds of prosecutorial misconduct and double jeopardy.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s decision to deny the Defendant-Appellant's motion to dismiss.
Reasons
-
The panel of judges, consisting of Timothy L. Garcia, Jonathan B. Sutin, and J. Miles Hanisee, concurred in the decision to affirm the district court's denial of the Defendant-Appellant's motion to dismiss. The decision was based on reasons previously stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition, which the Defendant-Appellant chose not to oppose further by not filing a memorandum in opposition (paras 1-3).
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.