AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves a dispute between Annette Hemberger and Ginifer Galey, where the nature of their relationship was under scrutiny. The specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellee (Annette Hemberger): [Not applicable or not found]
• Respondent-Appellant (Ginifer Galey): [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the relationship of the parties qualifies as that of an "intimate partner" as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(32).

Disposition

• The district court’s finding that the relationship of the parties is that of an "intimate partner" as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(32) was reversed.
• The district court’s order was affirmed in all other respects.

Reasons

• Per LINDA M. VANZI, Judge (TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge, J. MILES HANISEE, Judge concurring):
  The Court of Appeals decided to reverse the district court's classification of the parties' relationship as that of an "intimate partner" under federal law, specifically 18 U.S.C. § 921(a)(32). This decision was made following the proposal for partial summary affirmance and partial summary reversal, to which no opposition was filed within the allotted time frame (para 1-3). The court's reasoning for this reversal is not detailed beyond the summary disposition notice. The appellate court affirmed the district court's order in all other aspects, indicating agreement with the lower court's decisions on matters not directly related to the classification of the relationship (para 2-3).