AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the Plaintiff-Appellant (Mother) appealing from district court orders concerning child support, travel expenses, and attorney fees. The Mother initiated the appeal pro se, challenging the district court's decisions made on October 4, 2013, and February 17, 2014.

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County, October 4, 2013: Issued a minute order addressing matters related to child support, travel expenses, and attorney fees.
• District Court of Bernalillo County, February 17, 2014: Issued a final minute order concerning the same matters as the previous order.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant (Mother): Appealed pro se from the district court's orders regarding child support, travel expenses, and attorney fees. Did not file a memorandum in opposition to the second notice but initiated a second appeal and filed a docketing statement in the Court of Appeals.
• Defendant-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's orders regarding child support, travel expenses, and attorney fees should be affirmed.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders on child support, travel expenses, and attorney fees.

Reasons

• Per M. Monica Zamora, with Roderick T. Kennedy and Timothy L. Garcia concurring, the Court of Appeals decided to affirm the district court's decisions. The Mother did not file a memorandum in opposition to the court's second notice, and the court was not persuaded by her arguments. The appeals from the same district court orders in both cases were consolidated under Ct.App.No. 33,348, and for the reasons discussed in the second calendar notice, the court affirmed the district court's orders (paras 1-4).