AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant was convicted for criminal damage to property valued over $1,000 and for defacing tombs, as per the statutes NMSA 1978, Section 30-15-1 (1963), and NMSA 1978, Section 30-12-13 (1963), respectively.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellee (State of New Mexico): [Not applicable or not found]
• Defendant-Appellant (Christopher Healy Williams): The Defendant reiterated the issues raised in his docketing statement but failed to assert any new facts, law, or argument that could persuade the Court that the notice of proposed disposition was erroneous (para 2).

Legal Issues

• (N/A)

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the Defendant's convictions for criminal damage to property (over $1,000) and defacing tombs.

Reasons

• Per Ives, J., with Hanisee, J., and Medina, J., concurring: The Court considered the Defendant's memorandum in opposition but found it unpersuasive as it did not present any new facts, law, or argument beyond what was already considered in the notice of proposed disposition. The Defendant's repetition of earlier arguments did not fulfill the requirement to specifically point out errors in fact or law. Therefore, the Court referred to its analysis in the notice of proposed disposition and affirmed the Defendant's convictions (paras 1-3).