AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The Defendant was on probation when the district court found that he had violated the terms of his probation. This violation led to the revocation of his probation and the imposition of judgment and sentence against him.

Procedural History

• District Court of Eddy County, Richard Brown, District Judge: The court issued an order revoking the Defendant's probation and imposing judgment and sentence.

Parties' Submissions

• Defendant-Appellant: Challenged the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the district court's finding that he violated the terms of his probation.
• Plaintiff-Appellee: Argued that the evidence was sufficient to establish with reasonable certainty that the Defendant violated the terms of his probation.

Legal Issues

• Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the district court's finding that the Defendant violated the terms of his probation.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order revoking the Defendant's probation and imposing judgment and sentence.

Reasons

• Per MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge (CYNTHIA A. FRY, Judge, MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Judge concurring): The Court of Appeals proposed to affirm the district court's decision in a notice of proposed summary disposition. The Defendant filed a memorandum in opposition but did not challenge the Court's review of the evidence or the analysis in the proposed disposition. After considering the Defendant's memorandum in opposition, the Court remained unpersuaded and affirmed the district court's order for the reasons set forth in the notice of proposed summary disposition.