AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• (N/A)

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Valencia County, John W. Pope, District Judge

Parties' Submissions

• Appellee: The State did not file a memorandum opposing the summary dismissal, indicating agreement with the proposed summary disposition (para 1).
• Appellant: Nicholas John Trujillo, acting pro se, did not file a memorandum opposing the summary dismissal, indicating no contest to the proposed summary disposition (para 1).

Legal Issues

• Whether the appeal should be dismissed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition (para 1).

Disposition

• The appeal was dismissed for the reasons stated in the court's calendar notice (para 2).

Reasons

• Per James J. Wechsler, with Cynthia A. Fry and Linda M. Vanzi, Judges, concurring:
  The court decided to dismiss the appeal based on the lack of opposition to the proposed summary dismissal from both parties. Since no memorandum opposing the summary dismissal was filed and the time for doing so expired, the court proceeded with dismissal according to the reasons outlined in their calendar notice (paras 1-2).