AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the Plaintiff, Butler Enterprises, Inc., appealing an order that denied its motion to reinstate its case after it was dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Procedural History

• District Court of San Juan County, Robert A. Aragon, District Judge: Denied the motion to reinstate the case after dismissal for failure to prosecute.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellant: Argued for the reinstatement of the case after it was dismissed for failure to prosecute.
• Defendants-Appellees: Initially opposed the reinstatement of the case but later conceded that the Plaintiff’s case should have been reinstated and therefore did not oppose summary reversal.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court erred in denying the Plaintiff's motion to reinstate the case after it was dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals reversed the district court's order denying the Plaintiff's motion to reinstate the case.

Reasons

• Per LINDA M. VANZI, J. (MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, J., and CYNTHIA A. FRY, J., concurring): The decision to reverse the district court's denial of the Plaintiff's motion to reinstate the case was based on the Defendants' concession that the Plaintiff’s case should have been reinstated and their lack of opposition to the summary reversal proposed by the Court of Appeals.