AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the appeal by Amity M. (Mother) against the district court's judgment terminating her parental rights to her children, Alesio R. and Aspen A.

Procedural History

• District Court of Mora County: The court terminated the parental rights of Amity M. (Mother)

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellee (Children, Youth & Families Department): The arguments presented by the Department are not detailed in the decision.
• Respondent-Appellant (Amity M., Mother): In her memorandum in opposition, Mother repeated the presentation of issues and facts asserted and argued in her docketing statement, without asserting any new facts, law, or argument that could persuade the Court that the notice of proposed disposition was erroneous (para 2).

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's judgment terminating Mother's parental rights was erroneous.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the termination of Mother’s parental rights (para 3).

Reasons

• The decision was authored by Judge Jennifer L. Attrep, with Judges Shammara H. Henderson and Jane B. Yohalem concurring. The Court considered Mother's memorandum in opposition but remained unpersuaded by the repetition of issues and facts previously asserted. The Court highlighted the burden on the party opposing the proposed disposition to clearly point out errors in fact or law, which Mother failed to do. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition and the memorandum opinion, the Court affirmed the termination of Mother’s parental rights (paras 1-3).