This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- Glen Miller, the Worker-Appellant, appealed a decision from the Workers' Compensation Administration against Broken Saddle Riding Company, INC., and Harrold Grantham, referred to as Uninsured Employers-Appellees, and the State of New Mexico Uninsured Employers’ Fund, the Statutory Entity-Appellee. The specifics leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.
Procedural History
- Appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Administration: The decision of the Workers' Compensation Judge, Leonard J. Padilla, is under appeal. (headnotes)
Parties' Submissions
- Worker-Appellant: Glen Miller represented himself in the appeal but the specific arguments he made are not detailed in the provided text. (N/A)
- Uninsured Employers-Appellees: Broken Saddle Riding Company and Harrold Grantham also represented themselves but their specific arguments are not detailed. (N/A)
- Statutory Entity-Appellee: The State of New Mexico Uninsured Employers’ Fund's specific arguments are not detailed.
Legal Issues
- (N/A) The decision does not specify the legal issues under consideration.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the Workers' Compensation Administration for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No opposing memorandum was filed within the allowed time. (paras 1-2)
Reasons
-
Per Yohalem J. (Bogardus and Duffy JJ. concurring): The decision to affirm the Workers' Compensation Administration's ruling was based on the absence of an opposing memorandum to the proposed summary disposition. The specifics of the Workers' Compensation Judge's decision or the appellate arguments are not discussed. (paras 1-2)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.