AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves an appeal by Philip Pekarcik against a decision involving the State of New Mexico ex rel. Human Services Department and Roberta Pekarcik. The specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Santa Fe County, David K. Thomson, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellee (State of New Mexico ex rel. Human Services Department and Roberta Pekarcik): [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellant (Philip Pekarcik): No memorandum opposing summary reversal was filed, and the time for doing so has expired.

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico reversed the decision of the District Court of Santa Fe County.

Reasons

  • Per Michael E. Vigil, J. (Michael D. Bustamante, J., and Timothy L. Garcia, J., concurring): The decision to reverse was based on the absence of an opposing memorandum to the proposed summary disposition by the appellant, Philip Pekarcik, within the given timeframe.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.