This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- Aide C. (Child) appealed from a consent decree.
Procedural History
- Appeal from the District Court of Lea County, Gary L. Clingman, District Judge, no citation available: A consent decree was issued against Aide C. (Child).
Parties' Submissions
- Child-Appellant: Argued for the appeal of the consent decree. (N/A)
- Plaintiff-Appellee (State): Indicated that it does not oppose the proposed summary disposition suggesting a reversal and remand for further proceedings.
Legal Issues
- Whether the consent decree against Aide C. (Child) should be reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.
Disposition
- The consent decree appealed by Aide C. (Child) is reversed and the case is remanded for further proceedings.
Reasons
-
Per Timothy L. Garcia, J. (J. Miles Hanisee, J., and M. Monica Zamora, J., concurring): The decision to reverse and remand for further proceedings was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. The State's response indicating no opposition to the proposed summary disposition was also considered.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.