AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• In 2008, a high school student was attacked at her home with a shovel. DNA evidence was collected at the scene. A "John Doe" indictment was filed in 2010 based on the DNA profile and physical description of the perpetrator. The Defendant's DNA matched the profile in 2017, leading to his arrest and subsequent charges, including attempted first-degree murder and aggravated burglary with a deadly weapon. The Defendant entered a no contest plea to these charges (paras 2-4).

Procedural History

• District Court of Bernalillo County: Denied Defendant's motion to dismiss based on the statute of limitations and denied presentence confinement credit for time spent on house arrest (paras 3, 18).
• Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico: Affirmed the convictions and reversed the sentence regarding the denial of presentence confinement credit, remanding for sentencing in accordance with the opinion (para 35).

Parties' Submissions

• Defendant-Appellant: Argued that the convictions were barred by the statute of limitations and sought presentence confinement credit for time spent on house arrest (para 1).
• Plaintiff-Appellee: Contended that the Defendant waived the statute of limitations defense by entering a no contest plea and opposed presentence confinement credit for the house arrest period (paras 5, 19).

Legal Issues

• Whether the Defendant waived his statute of limitations defense by entering a no contest plea (para 5).
• Whether the Defendant is entitled to presentence confinement credit for the period spent on house arrest (para 19).

Disposition

• The Defendant's convictions for attempted first-degree murder and aggravated burglary with a deadly weapon were affirmed.
• The denial of presentence confinement credit for time spent on house arrest was reversed, and the case was remanded for sentencing in accordance with the opinion (para 35).

Reasons

• Statute of Limitations Waiver: The court held that the Defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his statute of limitations defense by entering a no contest plea, having been fully aware of the statute and its implications (paras 5-7, 12-13).
  Presentence Confinement Credit: The court found that the Defendant's conditions of release were sufficiently restrictive to qualify as "official confinement" under the law, entitling him to presentence confinement credit for the period spent on house arrest (paras 20-34).