AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The petitioner-appellant, acting pro se, appealed against the New Mexico Developmental Disabilities Planning Council, Office of Guardianship, its Executive Director Cristine Marchand, and Records Custodian Karen Courtney-Peterson. The specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Santa Fe County, Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellant: The petitioner-appellant, acting pro se, submitted an appeal against the respondents. The specific arguments made by the petitioner-appellant are not detailed in the provided text. (N/A)
• Respondents-Appellees: Represented by the Attorney General and an Assistant Attorney General, the respondents-appellees' specific arguments in response to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the District Court's decision should be affirmed.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the decision of the District Court.

Reasons

• Per Michael D. Bustamante, J. (Michael E. Vigil, J., and Timothy L. Garcia, J., concurring): The Court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision.