AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves a dispute over the physical custody of a child, with Eric Childers and Deandra Childers as the Petitioner-Appellee and Respondent-Appellee, respectively. Richard and Martha Teakell, the Physical Custodians-Appellants, and Gary Childers, the Intervenor-Appellee, are also parties to the case. The specific events leading to the custody dispute are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Petitioner-Appellee (Eric Childers): [Not applicable or not found]
• Respondent-Appellee (Deandra Childers): [Not applicable or not found]
• Physical Custodians-Appellants (Richard and Martha Teakell): [Not applicable or not found]
• Intervenor-Appellee (Gary Childers): [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

• (N/A)

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision for the reasons stated in their calendar notice (para 2).

Reasons

• Per JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge (MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge, and LINDA M. VANZI, Judge concurring): The decision to affirm was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision without further detail provided (paras 1-3).