This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- The case involves Raymond E. Mills, a worker who appealed against Bancroft & Son's Trucking and Redwood Fire & Casualty, his employer and insurer, respectively. The specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.
Procedural History
- Appeal from the Workers’ Compensation Administration, Leonard J. Padilla, Workers’ Compensation Judge.
Parties' Submissions
- Worker-Appellant: The appellant's arguments or evidence are not specified in the provided text. (N/A)
- Employer/Insurer-Appellees: The appellees' arguments or evidence are not specified in the provided text.
Legal Issues
- Whether the Workers’ Compensation Administration's decision should be affirmed.
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Administration. (para 1)
Reasons
-
Per LINDA M. VANZI, J. (JENNIFER L. ATTREP, J., KRISTINA BOGARDUS, J., concurring): The court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision. (paras 1-2)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.