AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

State v. Jaksha (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 09/16/2014
Docket Numbers 33,442
Relations See full-text opinion - State v. Jaksha - 09/16/2014 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Lea County, William G. Shoobridge, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Lea County (para 2).

Reasons

  • Per J. Miles Hanisee, with James J. Wechsler and Michael E. Vigil, Judges, concurring: The decision to affirm was based on the reasons stated in the calendar notice. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.