AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the State's appeal of an order granting the Defendant's motion to suppress evidence. Specific details leading to the motion to suppress are not provided in the text.

Procedural History

• [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

• Appellant (State of New Mexico): The text does not specify the arguments made by the State.
• Appellee (Jim A. Zafarano): The text does not specify the arguments made by the Defendant.

Legal Issues

• Whether the order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress should be affirmed.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the order granting Defendant’s motion to suppress.

Reasons

• RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge (LINDA M. VANZI, Judge, TIMOTHY L. GARCIA concurring): The Court decided to affirm the order granting the Defendant's motion to suppress based on reasons set forth in a notice of proposed summary disposition. The State indicated it would not file a memorandum in opposition to this proposed summary disposition, leading to the Court's decision to affirm without further opposition.