AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Hunt v. Hallmark Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co. (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 12/06/2021
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-39351
Relations See full-text opinion - Hunt v. Hallmark Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co. - 12/06/2021 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • District Court of Rio Arriba County, Matthew Justin Wilson, District Judge: [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiffs-Appellants: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendant-Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The decision of the District Court of Rio Arriba County was affirmed (para 1).

Reasons

  • The Court, comprising Judge Zachary A. Ives, Judge Kristina Bogardus, and Judge Jane B. Yohalem, unanimously decided to affirm the lower court's decision. The affirmation was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired (paras 1-2).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.