AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The case involves the United States of America, acting through the Rural Housing Service, as the plaintiff-appellee, against Valerie L. Otero and Andrew S. Lane, who are defendants. The specific events leading to the case are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Valencia County, Judge James Lawrence Sanchez: The details of the lower court's decision are not provided, but it is the decision from which Valerie L. Otero appealed.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiff-Appellee (Rural Housing Service): The arguments and evidence presented by the Rural Housing Service are not specified in the provided text. (N/A)
• Defendant-Appellant (Valerie L. Otero): Valerie L. Otero, representing herself pro se, did not file a memorandum opposing the proposed summary affirmance, and the time to do so has expired. (para 1)
• Defendant (Andrew S. Lane): Andrew S. Lane, also representing himself pro se, is mentioned but his specific arguments or submissions are not detailed in the provided text.

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's decision should be affirmed in the absence of an opposing memorandum filed by the defendant-appellant, Valerie L. Otero. (para 1)

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Valencia County. (para 2)

Reasons

• Per LINDA M. VANZI, Chief Judge, with concurrence from M. MONICA ZAMORA, Judge, and JENNIFER L. ATTREP, Judge:
  The Court of Appeals decided to affirm the lower court's decision based on the proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in a notice not detailed in the provided text. The decision to affirm was also influenced by the absence of any memorandum opposing the summary affirmance filed by Valerie L. Otero, with the time for filing such a memorandum having expired. (paras 1-3)