AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • The case involves an appeal by the plaintiffs against the Board of Regents of the University of New Mexico, Office of the Medical Investigator, and Anthony Cervantes, following the district court's order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss. The plaintiffs include Jesse Lucero, Lanna Lucero, and Aaron Garrett, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Janae A. Lucero, Deceased. Specific events leading to the appeal are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

  • District Court of Bernalillo County: The district court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss. (headnotes)

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiffs-Appellants: The plaintiffs appealed the district court's decision to dismiss their case. However, specific arguments made by the plaintiffs in their appeal are not provided. (N/A)
  • Defendants-Appellees: The defendants filed a memorandum in support of the proposed summary affirmance of the district court's order to dismiss the case. Specific arguments made by the defendants are not detailed. (para 1)

Legal Issues

  • Whether the district court's order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss should be affirmed. (para 1)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order granting the defendant's motion to dismiss. (para 2)

Reasons

  • Per Bogardus, J. (Attrep and Medina, JJ., concurring): The Court of Appeals decided to affirm the district court's order based on the reasoning set out in the Court's notice of proposed disposition dated November 29, 2021. The plaintiffs did not file a memorandum in opposition to the Court's notice of proposed disposition within the allotted time, leading the Court to rely on its initial reasoning for the decision. (paras 1-2)
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.