This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
- The Defendant was on probation when the district court issued orders revoking his probation and denying his motion for reconsideration. The Defendant then appealed these orders. (para 1)
Procedural History
- Appeal from the District Court of San Juan County: The district court's orders revoking the Defendant's probation and denying his motion for reconsideration were upheld.
Parties' Submissions
- Appellant: Conceded that, despite significant additional legal research and potential issues for other legal proceedings, there was no arguable error or issue in the appeal that could result in a more favorable disposition. (para 1)
- Appellee: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether there was any arguable error or issue in the appeal that could result in a disposition more favorable to the Defendant. (para 1)
Disposition
- The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's orders revoking the Defendant's probation and denying his motion for reconsideration. (para 2)
Reasons
-
Per VANZI, J. (HANISEE, C.J., and VARGAS, J., concurring): The Court decided to affirm the district court's decisions based on the Defendant's concession that there was no arguable error or issue in the appeal that could lead to a more favorable outcome for him, in light of the well-established standard and limited scope of review. This decision was also influenced by the reasons stated in the Court's notice of proposed disposition. (paras 1-2)
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.