AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• The plaintiffs, Ronnie Thomas et al., sought to have their civil complaint reinstated through a second Rule 1-060(B) NMRA motion after it was previously denied by the district court.

Procedural History

• Appeal from the District Court of Bernalillo County, Clay Campbell, District Judge, denying the plaintiffs' second Rule 1-060(B) NMRA motion for reinstatement of their civil complaint.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiffs-Appellants: Argued for the reinstatement of their civil complaint through a second Rule 1-060(B) NMRA motion. (N/A)
• Defendants-Appellees: Supported the proposed summary disposition affirming the district court's denial of the plaintiffs' motion for reinstatement. (para 1)

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court's order denying the plaintiffs' second Rule 1-060(B) NMRA motion seeking reinstatement of their civil complaint should be affirmed. (para 1)

Disposition

• The district court's order denying the plaintiffs' second Rule 1-060(B) NMRA motion for reinstatement of their civil complaint is affirmed. (para 2)

Reasons

• RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge, with MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge, and STEPHEN G. FRENCH, Judge concurring, decided to affirm the district court's denial of the plaintiffs' second Rule 1-060(B) NMRA motion for reinstatement of their civil complaint. The decision was based on the reasons set out in the court's notice of proposed summary disposition, which was supported by the appellee's memorandum and unopposed by the appellant. (paras 1-2)