AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Lambert v. Gardner (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 05/05/2022
Docket Numbers A-1-CA-39313
Relations See full-text opinion - Lambert v. Gardner - 05/05/2022 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • District Court of Bernalillo County, Victor S. Lopez, District Judge: [Not applicable or not found]

Parties' Submissions

  • Plaintiff-Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Defendants-Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The appeal was affirmed (para 1).

Reasons

  • HANISEE, Chief Judge, IVES, Judge, and YOHALEM, Judge, concurring:
    The Court of Appeals of the State of New Mexico, led by Chief Judge Hanisee with Judges Ives and Yohalem concurring, decided to affirm the decision of the lower court. The affirmation was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the decision to affirm (para 1).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.