AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Mosqueda-Mata v. De Haro (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 10/03/2016
Docket Numbers 35,513
Relations See full-text opinion - Mosqueda-Mata v. De Haro - 10/03/2016 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Chaves County, Kea W. Riggs, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • (N/A)

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The Court of Appeals of New Mexico affirmed the decision of the District Court of Chaves County (para 2).

Reasons

  • Per Michael E. Vigil, Chief Judge (Linda M. Vanzi, Judge, and M. Monica Zamora, Judge, concurring):
    The Court proposed summary affirmance for reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance was filed, and the time for doing so expired, leading to the affirmation of the lower court's decision (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.