AI Generated Opinion Summaries

Decision Information

Scarborough v. C&S Partnership (AI Generated Opinion Summaries)

Collection AI Generated Opinion Summaries
Date 06/30/2015
Docket Numbers 34,483
Relations See full-text opinion - Scarborough v. C&S Partnership - 06/30/2015 - Unreported Opinions

Decision Content

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

  • (N/A)

Procedural History

  • Appeal from the District Court of Rio Arriba County, Francis J. Mathew, District Judge.

Parties' Submissions

  • Appellant: [Not applicable or not found]
  • Appellees: [Not applicable or not found]

Legal Issues

  • (N/A)

Disposition

  • The appeal was dismissed (para 2).

Reasons

  • Per Michael E. Vigil, Chief Judge (Jonathan B. Sutin, Judge, M. Monica Zamora, Judge concurring):
    The Court of Appeals of New Mexico, led by Chief Judge Michael E. Vigil with Judges Jonathan B. Sutin and M. Monica Zamora concurring, decided to dismiss the appeal. The decision for summary dismissal was based on the reasons stated in the notice of proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing the summary dismissal was filed, and the time for doing so had expired, leading to the court's decision to dismiss the appeal (paras 1-3).
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.