AI Generated Opinion Summaries

This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.

Facts

• Plaintiffs filed a lawsuit against several defendants, including CELLCO PARTNERSHIP, INC. d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS and other associated entities and individuals, challenging actions presumably related to contractual or service issues. The specifics of the events leading to the lawsuit are not detailed in the provided text.

Procedural History

• District Court of Santa Fe County, Raymond Z. Ortiz, District Judge: Granted motion to dismiss first amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings.

Parties' Submissions

• Plaintiffs-Appellants: The specific arguments made by the plaintiffs are not detailed in the provided text.
• Defendants-Appellees: Supported the court's proposal to affirm the district court’s order, with a memorandum in support filed and joined by Defendant Nations Recovery Center, Inc. (para 1).

Legal Issues

• Whether the district court properly granted the motion to dismiss the first amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.
• Whether the district court correctly granted the motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings.

Disposition

• The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's order to dismiss the first amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction and to compel arbitration and stay proceedings (para 2).

Reasons

• Per J. Miles Hanisee, with concurrence from M. Monica Zamora and Emil J. Kiehne, Judges: The Court of Appeals decided to affirm the district court's order based on the reasoning set out in the Court's second notice of proposed disposition. The plaintiffs did not file a memorandum in opposition to the Court's second notice of proposed disposition within the allotted time, leading the Court to rely on its previously stated reasoning for its decision (para 1).