This summary was computer-generated without any editorial revision. It is not official, has not been checked for accuracy, and is NOT citable.
Facts
The case involves a petition for a writ of certiorari filed by the Defendant-Petitioner. The petition sought review of a decision made by the New Mexico Court of Appeals. The Defendant also filed a motion to supplement the petition. The specific facts or events leading to the case are not provided in the decision.
Procedural History
- New Mexico Court of Appeals: The decision under review by the Supreme Court of New Mexico.
Parties' Submissions
- Defendant-Petitioner: Filed a petition for a writ of certiorari and a motion to supplement the petition. (N/A)
- Plaintiff-Respondent: [Not applicable or not found]
Legal Issues
- Whether the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.
- Whether the motion to supplement the petition should be granted.
Disposition
- The motion to supplement the petition was granted.
- The petition for a writ of certiorari was granted, and a writ of certiorari was issued to the New Mexico Court of Appeals.
- A subsequent order will identify the issues upon which the petition is granted and provide instructions regarding a briefing schedule, if any.
Reasons
Per Chief Justice Pamela B. Minzner (with Justices Joseph F. Baca, Gene E. Franchini, Patricio M. Serna, and Petra Jimenez Maes concurring):
The Court considered the petition for a writ of certiorari and the motion to supplement the petition. After reviewing the pleadings, the Court determined that both the motion to supplement and the petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted. The Court ordered that a writ of certiorari be issued to the New Mexico Court of Appeals and indicated that a subsequent order would outline the issues for review and any briefing schedule.