New Mexico Forms Library

Decision Information

Citations - New Mexico Appellate Reports
State v. Denzel B. - cited by 26 documents

Decision Content

14-5191. Self defense; limitations; aggressor.1

            Before you consider whether the defendant acted in self defense, you must first decide whether the defendant was the first aggressor. The defendant was the first aggressor if the defendant

                        [started the fight with ______________ (name of victim)]2

            [or]

                        [agreed to fight with ______________ (name of victim)]

            [or]

                        [intentionally provoked a fight in order to harm ______________ (name of victim)]

            [or]

                        [committed the act of _________________ (describe defendant’s conduct that constituted the alleged crime), in response to ______________’s (name of victim) act of _________________ (describe conduct of victim giving rise to an appearance of immediate danger of harm to defendant), where ______________’s (name of victim) act was the [lawful and]3 foreseeable result of _________________ (describe defendant’s alleged unlawful act that resulted in victim’s conduct)]4.

            The burden is on the state to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was the first aggressor. [If the defendant was the first aggressor, the defendant cannot claim self defense. If the defendant was not the first aggressor, you should proceed to decide whether the defendant acted in self defense.]5 [If you find that the defendant was the first aggressor, you must then decide whether ______________ (name of victim) became the aggressor. If ______________ (name of victim) became the aggressor, the defendant may claim self defense even though the defendant was the first aggressor.]6

USE NOTES

            1.         This instruction must be given in all self defense cases in which first aggressor is an issue.

            2.         Use only applicable bracketed element or elements established by the evidence.

            3.         If the lawfulness of the victim’s conduct is at issue, e.g., may have been privileged or justified, give appropriate definition.

            4.         This alternative should be used when the defendant provoked the victim through an unlawful act and the victim responded in a lawful manner. See State v. Denzel B., 2008-NMCA-118, 144 N.M. 746, 192 P.3d 260; see also committee commentary, infra.

            5.         Use this bracketed alternative in cases where UJI 14-5191A NMRA will not be given.

            6.         Use this bracketed alternative in cases where UJI 14-5191A will be given. If UJI 14-5191A will be given, it should immediately follow this instruction.

[As amended by Supreme Court Order No. 19-8300-016, effective for all cases pending or filed on or after December 31, 2019.]

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.