Court of Appeals of New Mexico
Decision Information
Rule Set 12 - Rules of Appellate Procedure - cited by 9,435 documents
Decision Content
KRUSKAL V. MARTINEZ
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
KERRY KRUSKAL,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
JUAN MARTINEZ and DIANA
MARTINEZ, husband and wife,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 35,237
COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO
May 18, 2016
APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TAOS COUNTY, Jeff
McElroy, District Judge
COUNSEL
Kerry Kruskal, Arroyo Seco, NM, Pro Se Appellant
Carol A. Neelley PC, Carol A. Neelley, Santa Fe, NM, for Appellees
JUDGES
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge. WE CONCUR: MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge, LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired.
{2} Affirmed.
{3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
WE CONCUR:
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Chief Judge
LINDA M. VANZI, Judge